Fair compensation for road crash victims–this should not be too much to ask for road crash victims–given the state had already failed to protect them from harm.
But the MoJ is proposing (yet again) to make life harder for crash victims.
They have launched a lengthy consultation. In a nutshell…
The MoJ want to reduce, if not eliminate, compensation for the pain and suffering incurred by whiplash. To tackle fake whiplash claims, they are proposing to deny compensation for innocent victims. Even those injured in crashes where a driver was prosecuted for causing the crash—even these victims would be treated as if they are fraudulent.
And they also want to increase the small claims court limit from £1k to £5k. This would mean that all those victims with claims up to £5k would not be able to get their legal costs paid. Crash victims would be expected to defend themselves or pay out of their pocket to be represented by a professional after being wrongfully injured.
No surprise—RoadPeace (still) opposes them
RoadPeace opposes the MoJ’s, proposal, as we did in 2013 when similar proposals were drafted. At that time, the House of Commons Transport Committee appreciated the unfairness in these proposals and were able to stop them from being implemented. With much greater commitment to promoting active travel, we need their help and others to help block the new proposals.
So we are campaigning with Cycling UK and Living Streets to ensure that road victims are treated as real victims. Cycling UK has been fantastic and organised an easy to use on line letter that is sent to the MoJ. Please write today to ensure the MoJ knows how disastrous these proposals would be.
CWIS, Better Justice and Civil Justice
And the active travel community is right to be worried. These proposals are particularly unfair to pedestrians and cyclists. We highlighted this concern in our response to the draft CWIS consultation this spring, where we called for a Better Justice theme to be added, noting that
Those walking and cycling face not only greater risk of being injured, but they will also be much less likely to have access to justice and legal advice through an insurance policy. And the proposed reform of removing the right to general damages and increase in the small claims court limit will make it even harder for injured walkers and cyclists to claim compensation.
The government’s recent British Road Safety Statement prioritised “Fair and responsive” insurance but focused only on reducing the costs for insurance companies and “honest motorists”, with no thought given to innocent victims of crashes. Whiplash is a problem with motor vehicle occupants, too often caused by criminal drivers. Injured pedestrians and cyclists should not be penalised as a should not be penalised as a result reforms aimed at reducing whiplash and fraudulent claims.
Need to cycle proof justice policies
We also argued in our response that
Just as the CWIS proposes to review the planning process to audit its impact on active travel, so should this apply to any changes in civil compensation or criminal justice procedures.
If government is to be serious about promoting active travel, then we need joined up thinking and consistent policies.
We also raised this with Andrew Jones, Road Safety Minister, after the DfT’s British Road Safety Statement was published. RoadPeace offered to organise a meeting with victims and personal injury solicitors to ensure the DfT were reminded of the honest need for motor insurance compensation.
And we repeated this offer last month, when the Road Safety Minister attended our London service commemorating the World Day of Remembrance for Road Traffic Victims. By this time, the MoJ had launched its consultation, with the dreaded proposals on whiplash claims and small claim limits.
There are many ways in which the MoJ does not treat crash victims as victims, including:
Please don’t let them add to this list. Consultation closes 6 January 2017.